Private Capability Benchmarks
Human-authored question sets designed for your specific model tasks — not off-the-shelf benchmarks. Private, non-contaminated, directly relevant to your evaluation needs.
Human-constructed benchmarks that measure what matters — real-world task performance, nuanced instruction following, and capability gaps that standard automated metrics obscure or miss entirely.
Models that score well on MMLU, HumanEval, and HellaSwag are still shipped with significant real-world capability gaps. Public benchmarks become contaminated with training data, and teams increasingly need private, human-constructed evaluations that reflect their specific use case and user population.
Fuzu Atlas builds custom benchmarks from scratch: human-authored questions, scenarios, and evaluation criteria designed to measure what your model actually needs to do well — not what public benchmarks were designed to test.
Public benchmarks frequently appear in model training data. Performance on contaminated benchmarks is not a reliable measure of generalisation.
Standard benchmarks test generic capabilities. Custom benchmarks built around your actual use case measure whether the model will work for your users.
Most public benchmarks are English-centric. Private multilingual benchmarks are required to evaluate capability across language markets.
One-off benchmarks don't track capability regression as models are fine-tuned. Ongoing benchmarking programs catch the degradation before it reaches users.
Human-authored question sets designed for your specific model tasks — not off-the-shelf benchmarks. Private, non-contaminated, directly relevant to your evaluation needs.
Parallel benchmark sets across your target language markets — authored by native speakers with equivalent difficulty calibration across languages.
Medical, legal, financial, and scientific benchmarks authored by credentialed domain experts. Tests that a generalist cannot pass by memorisation alone.
Stable benchmark sets run after each model update to detect capability regression. Human evaluation maintained over long model development cycles.
Human-constructed instruction sets across complexity levels and constraint types. Scored by trained evaluators against rubrics designed for your deployment context.
Side-by-side model comparison studies with target-population evaluators. Measures user-facing quality, not just automated metric alignment.
Define your evaluation goals — we'll construct the benchmark, run the evaluation, and deliver actionable findings.